科研团队绩效评价的现状与对策——基于软科学研究院所的调查分析

中国人事科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (11): 8-15.

科研团队绩效评价的现状与对策——基于软科学研究院所的调查分析

张晓静

出版日期:2023-11-26 发布日期:2023-12-19
作者简介:张晓静北京市科学技术研究院科技情报研究所人力资源和财务部主任、经济师

The Current Situation and Countermeasures of Performance Evaluation for Scientific Research Teams— Based on Survey and Analysis on the Soft Science Research Institutes

Zhang Xiaojing

Online:2023-11-26 Published:2023-12-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 绩效评价是软科学研究院所科研团队管理的重要环节,对推动科研团队的建设和发展至关重要。文章采用深度访谈和网络调查等方法,从软科学研究院所绩效评价工作的评价制度、评价指标设计、评价组织实施、评价结果应用、问题与建议反馈等方面对软科学研究院所科研团队绩效评价现状展开调研。研究发现,软科学研究院所绩效评价的主要问题为顶层设计不足、定性指标相对欠缺、成果转化应用重视不足、评价机制不够完善等,建议加强绩效评价顶层设计和制度建设,优化评价指标体系,完善评价机制,重视评价结果应用。

关键词: 科研团队, 绩效评价, 软科学研究院所, 调查分析

Abstract: Performance evaluation is an important link in the management of research teams in soft science research institutes, and is crucial for promoting the construction and development of research teams. This paper adopts methods such as in-depth interviews and online surveys to survey the performance evaluation status of research teams in soft science research institutes from the aspects of evaluation system, evaluation indicator design, evaluation organization and implementation, evaluation result application, and problem and suggestion feedback. The research has found that the performance evaluation of the soft science research institutes has prominent problems such as insufficient top-level design, relatively lack of qualitative indicators, insufficient emphasis on achievement transformation and application, and inadequate evaluation mechanism. It is recommended to strengthen the top-level design and institutional construction of performance evaluation, optimize the evaluation indicator system, improve the evaluation mechanism, and attach importance to the evaluation result application.

Key words: Research team, Performance evaluation, Soft science research institutes, Survey and analysis

中图分类号:

D035.2

张晓静. 科研团队绩效评价的现状与对策——基于软科学研究院所的调查分析[J]. 中国人事科学, 2023, 50(11): 8-15.

Zhang Xiaojing. The Current Situation and Countermeasures of Performance Evaluation for Scientific Research Teams— Based on Survey and Analysis on the Soft Science Research Institutes[J]. Chinese Personnel Science, 2023, 50(11): 8-15.

参考文献

[1] LEVI D, SLEM C.Team Work in Research and Development Organizations: The Characteristics of Successful Teams[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergomics,1995(16):29-42.
[2] NIEVA V F, FLEISHMAN E A, RIECK A.Team Dimensions: Their Identity, Their Measurement, and Their Relationships[M].Bethesda: Advanced Research Resources Organization,1985:122-132.
[3] AMABILE, T M, SCHATZEL E A, MONETA G B, KRAMER S J.Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2004,15:5-32.
[4] PEARCE C L,HERBIK P A.Citizenship Behavior at the Team Level of Analysis: The Effects of Team Leadership, Team Commitment, Perceived Team Support, and Team Size[J]. The Journal of Social Psychology,2004,144(3):293-310.
[5] 刘璇,朱庆华,段宇锋.社会网络分析法运用于科研团队发现和评价的实证研究[J].信息资源管理学报,2011,1(3):32-37.
[6] 刘慧. 高校创新团队绩效影响因素及评价研究[D].天津:天津大学,2014.
[7] 黄伟. 我国航天企业科研团队绩效评价问题研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2016.
[8] 何娣,陈兰.企业科研团队R&D绩效评价指标体系研究[J].中国人力资源开发,2012(10):45-48.
[9] 王文娟. 我国高校科研团队绩效评价指标体系研究:基于投入产出视角[D].济南:山东师范大学,2013.
[10] 曹丹. 基于多源信息融合的科研团队绩效评价问题研究与应用[D].北京:北京邮电大学,2017.
[11] 于水,胡祥培.高校科研团队考核指标体系建立的研究[J].管理观察,2008(18):159-160.
[12] 张喜爱. 高校科研团队绩效评价指标体系的构建研究:基于AHP法[J].科技管理研究,2009,29(2):225-227.
[13] 韩成标. 高校科研团队绩效评价相关问题研究[J].江苏高教,2013(5):61-62.
[14] 刘杰. 高校科研团队考核评价机制研究[J].中国高校科技,2019(8):33-36.
[15] 辛琳琳. 以质量为导向构建高校科研团队绩效评价机制[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2014(01):64-68.
[16] 黄诗童,车琳娜,赵希男.科研团队成员绩效评价机制的战略构建[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(13):152-157.
[17] 吴磊,胡可,王刚.基于改进区间数证据理论的高校科研团队绩效评价[J].南昌大学学报(理科版),2018,42(5):495-499.
[18] 包含丽,郑伟,韦小青.基于AHP和TOPSIS的高校科研团队绩效评价研究[J].科技管理研究, 2012, 32(10):114-117.
[19] 姜彤彤. 基于DEA的高校创新型科研团队绩效评估实证研究[J].高教探索,2014(5):42-45.
[20] 张绍辉. 高校科研团队的绩效评价:基于模糊层次综合分析[J].统计与管理,2014(4):54-57.